Resources >

Still Complicated > Covid-19 pandemic and…

Report Chapters
  1. Acknowledgements
  2. Foreword
  3. Introduction
  4. Methodology
  5. How we define bi+
  6. Demographics
  7. Key findings
  8. Community and belonging
  9. Belonging to the LGBT+ community
  10. Belonging to a bi+ community
  11. Belonging to a ‘straight community’
  12. Summary (Community and belonging)
  13. Bi+ experiences in LGBTI+ services
  14. Biphobia in LGBTI+ spaces
  15. Other barriers to participation in LGBTI+ spaces
  16. Mainstream public services and the bi+ experience
  17. NHS services
  18. Sexual health services
  19. Police services
  20. Religious services
  21. Other services
  22. Summary (Mainstream public services and the bi+ experience)
  23. Bi+ intersectionality
  24. Employment
  25. Covid-19 pandemic and the bi+ experience
  26. Covid-19 related healthcare
  27. Social challenges
  28. Financial hardships
  29. Bi+ community groups
  30. Summary (Covid-19 pandemic and the bi+ experience)
  31. Good practice
  32. Recommendations
  33. Increased knowledge and understanding
  34. Avoiding assumptions and generalising
  35. Dealing with discrimination
  36. Bi+ specific support and inclusion
  37. Increase representation of bi+ people
  38. Resources and further reading
  39. Bibliography
  40. Glossary

Covid-19 pandemic and the bi+ experience

During the earlier stages of the Covid-19 pandemic, people were categorised into levels of risk for the virus in order to prioritise and protect vulnerable groups. People with compromised immune systems, serious respiratory conditions or advanced age were considered high risk or clinically extremely vulnerable. People in this group were more restricted in where they could go and were offered the vaccine before the general population. This group especially was more reliant on services, friends and neighbours to provide for their basic needs such as food and medicine.

People who were at less risk of serious health complications but who would still be vulnerable to infection and may struggle to recover from illness were considered at risk and were advised to be more careful. This was the second group to be offered the vaccine.

Covid-19 is still a risk to life and people who were categorised as high risk are still at risk. As many people who were not considered in danger from the virus initially go back to normal life, people who are at more risk are restricted even more as restrictions and mask mandates are lifted.

Out of a total of 300 respondents, the breakdown of their risk level, or that of their household members from Covid-19, was as follows:

  • 20 respondents (6%) were at the highest risk and were asked to shield themselves.
  • 10 respondents (3%) had a household member at the highest risk who was asked to shield.
  • 62 respondents (20%) were at risk themselves and were offered the vaccine earlier.
  • 24 respondents (8%) had a household member at risk who was offered the vaccine earlier.
  • 184 respondents (59%) did not fall into any of the above categories.

During the Covid-19 pandemic, everyone had to adapt to changing guidelines, a fearful community, and loss. While it is important to recognise that the impact has been diverse, and that individual experiences can vary greatly, some common themes have emerged.

Subsections

  1. Covid-19 related healthcare
  2. Social challenges
  3. Financial hardships
  4. Bi+ community groups
  5. Summary (Covid-19 pandemic and the bi+ experience)

Join our eNewsletter

Join 20,000 people and sign up to our mailing list today. View previous newsletters here.

30 Bernard Street
Edinburgh EH6 6PR