Resources >

Still Complicated > Social challenges

Report Chapters
  1. Acknowledgements
  2. Foreword
  3. Introduction
  4. Methodology
  5. How we define bi+
  6. Demographics
  7. Key findings
  8. Community and belonging
  9. Belonging to the LGBT+ community
  10. Belonging to a bi+ community
  11. Belonging to a ‘straight community’
  12. Summary (Community and belonging)
  13. Bi+ experiences in LGBTI+ services
  14. Biphobia in LGBTI+ spaces
  15. Other barriers to participation in LGBTI+ spaces
  16. Mainstream public services and the bi+ experience
  17. NHS services
  18. Sexual health services
  19. Police services
  20. Religious services
  21. Other services
  22. Summary (Mainstream public services and the bi+ experience)
  23. Bi+ intersectionality
  24. Employment
  25. Covid-19 pandemic and the bi+ experience
  26. Covid-19 related healthcare
  27. Social challenges
  28. Financial hardships
  29. Bi+ community groups
  30. Summary (Covid-19 pandemic and the bi+ experience)
  31. Good practice
  32. Recommendations
  33. Increased knowledge and understanding
  34. Avoiding assumptions and generalising
  35. Dealing with discrimination
  36. Bi+ specific support and inclusion
  37. Increase representation of bi+ people
  38. Resources and further reading
  39. Bibliography
  40. Glossary

Social challenges

The bi+ community, like many others, faced social challenges which impacted their mental health and wellbeing. The isolation and social distancing measures affected people’s ability to connect with their communities and support networks, leading to increased feelings of loneliness and isolation. This was especially difficult for those who may not have disclosed their sexual orientation or gender to the people around them such as family, friends, or neighbours.

Equality Network’s own research has found that many LGBTI+ people felt that the government did not consider their support networks when implementing guidelines and restrictions throughout the pandemic, and specifically did not take into account ‘chosen family’. Others, meanwhile, found that the Scottish Government’s funding of Zoom accounts for LGBTI+ groups were invaluable in keeping communities connected[25].

“I feel that much of the guidance and legislation during lockdown was built on heteronormative middle class ideas of a nuclear family. I and many other lgbtqi+ friends could not meet in supportive environments as before, when households weren’t allowed to mix and ‘bubbles’ only allowed for single households. Many of us are not in nuclear families, we live in shared flats, sometimes with non-supportive people, and couldn’t meet.”

“I didn’t access any official services, but I did feel I have to appear as “normal” as possible to get support from neighbours who did shopping for me.”

“The pandemic made it impossible for me to access my community at all, due to various circumstances making online events completely inaccessible for me.”


Footnotes

  1. Nagle, A., Crowther, R., Sanders White, E. (2023) ‘Kinship, Family, and Support Networks in Scotland’s LGBTI+ Community’ (Return to reference [25])

Join our eNewsletter

Join 20,000 people and sign up to our mailing list today. View previous newsletters here.

30 Bernard Street
Edinburgh EH6 6PR